<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Barrdear &#187; Gelman</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barrdear.com/john/tag/gelman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barrdear.com/john</link>
	<description>Thoughts about economics, politics and life in general</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>US 2008 Presidential Election Breakdown</title>
		<link>http://barrdear.com/john/2008/11/06/us-2008-presidential-election-breakdown/</link>
		<comments>http://barrdear.com/john/2008/11/06/us-2008-presidential-election-breakdown/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 23:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Barrdear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Election]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gelman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jackman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barrdear.com/john/?p=217</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Andrew Gelman, who writes at Statistical modeling, has a quick summary of what took place over on his redbluerichpoor site.  The two take-away thoughts for me: 1) The red state/blue state divisions haven&#8217;t been redrawn.  There was simply a general shift across the board away from the Republicans and towards the Democrats: Update: See also [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Andrew Gelman's web page" href="http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/" target="_blank">Andrew Gelman</a>, who writes at <a title="Statistical modeling, causal inference and social science" href="http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/blog/" target="_blank">Statistical modeling</a>, has <a title="Andrew Gelman: Election 2008:  what really happened" href="http://redbluerichpoor.com/blog/?p=206" target="_blank">a quick summary of what took place</a> over on his redbluerichpoor site.  The two take-away thoughts for me:</p>
<p>1) The red state/blue state divisions haven&#8217;t been redrawn.  There was simply a general shift across the board away from the Republicans and towards the Democrats:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/mlm/2004_2008_actual.png" alt="" width="400" height="400" /></p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> See also <a title="John Barrdear:  More on the shift from Republican to Democrat" href="http://barrdear.com/john/2008/11/06/more-on-the-shift-from-republican-to-democrat/" target="_blank">More on the shift from Republican to Democrat</a>.</p>
<p>2) Nate Silver, at <a title="FiveThirtyEight.com" href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com" target="_blank">fivethirtyeight.com</a>, did a pretty good job of aggregating the polls to predict what would happen, at least for those states in the middle:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~cook/movabletype/mlm/2008_2008.png" alt="" width="400" height="400" /></p>
<p>I&#8217;ll leave the question over whether Nate&#8217;s aggregation technique was optimal to <a title="Simon Jackson:  Pooling the polls" href="http://jackman.stanford.edu/blog/?p=958" target="_blank">the experts</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barrdear.com/john/2008/11/06/us-2008-presidential-election-breakdown/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

