<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>John Barrdear &#187; Talking Points Memo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://barrdear.com/john/tag/talking-points-memo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://barrdear.com/john</link>
	<description>Thoughts about economics, politics and life in general</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 18:30:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Just a smidgen more on US healthcare reform</title>
		<link>http://barrdear.com/john/2009/10/13/just-a-smidgen-more-on-us-healthcare-reform/</link>
		<comments>http://barrdear.com/john/2009/10/13/just-a-smidgen-more-on-us-healthcare-reform/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 18:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John Barrdear</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Health Care]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Baucus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Healthcare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Hempton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paul Krugman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Silver]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Snowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Talking Points Memo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://barrdear.com/john/?p=772</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My previous comment on US healthcare reform, which was actually a comment on the current Australian system, got quite a few eyeballs thanks to John Hempton&#8217;s shout-out.  Anyway, I thought I&#8217;d highlight a couple of new developments for my little audience. First, Republican Senator Olympia Snowe (of Maine), who sits on the Senate Finance Committee, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My <a href="http://barrdear.com/john/2009/08/20/a-description-of-australias-healthcare-system/" target="_blank">previous comment</a> on US healthcare reform, which was actually a comment on the current Australian system, got quite a few eyeballs thanks to John Hempton&#8217;s shout-out.  Anyway, I thought I&#8217;d highlight a couple of new developments for my little audience.</p>
<p>First, Republican Senator Olympia Snowe (of Maine), who sits on the Senate Finance Committee, <a title="Bloomberg:  Republican Snowe to Vote for Baucus Health-Care Plan (Update2) " href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aWUX8JA8_i.w" target="_blank">has said</a> that she will vote in favour of the suggested bill being proposed by that committee&#8217;s chairman, Max Baucus.  That is good for the Democrats as it will provide valuable political cover.  It&#8217;s no guarantee that she will vote in favour of whatever the Senate as a whole end up producing, or for whatever the Senate and House then negotiate as the final bill, but it&#8217;s still a significant move and the probability of her voting for those later versions has just increased.</p>
<p>Second, we have the fact that the healthcare insurance industry has recently done an about-face, from actively promoting reform to actively fighting against it.  <a title="Nate Silver:  Why The Insurance Industry is Fighting Mad" href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/10/why-insurance-industry-is-fighting-mad.html" target="_blank">Nate Silver points out why</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Take a look at what&#8217;s happened to the share prices of the six largest publicly-traded health insurance companies since Labor Day, which was about the point at which the Democrats appeared to regain their footing &#8212; at least up to a point &#8212; on health care.</p>
<p><a href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_5ieXw28ZUpg/StMoRu1r9RI/AAAAAAAABWQ/XTk6UBvK8IM/s1600-h/hcstocks.png" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5391697463988712722" style="cursor: pointer; width: 351px; height: 210px;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_5ieXw28ZUpg/StMoRu1r9RI/AAAAAAAABWQ/XTk6UBvK8IM/s400/hcstocks.png" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Weighted for market capitalization, these insurance stocks have lost 11 percent of their value since Labor Day, wiping out about $10 billion in value. And that&#8217;s understating the case since the major indices have gained 5-8 percent over the same period &#8212; the insurance industry stocks are underperforming the market by just shy of 20 percent.</p></blockquote>
<p>So why have they tanked in the stock market?  Nate suggests two reasons:</p>
<blockquote><p>Firstly, the individual mandate has been weakened to the point where it&#8217;s arguably a tokenish provision. There are good, policy reasons to be worried about this, although the insurance lobby&#8217;s reasons for being opposed &#8212; they&#8217;ll have less guarantee of an incoming phalanx of high-margin customers &#8212; are not necessarily the same as the public&#8217;s at large. The second factor is that the Baucus bill in certain ways treats the insurers fairly harshly, both taxing them directly as well as levying a surcharge on high-cost insurance plans.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d also suggest that the compromise version of the public option (that it be in the bill, but with states able to opt out if they wish [<a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/10/08/opt-out-public-option" target="_self">Paul Krugman</a>, <a href="http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2009/10/conservative-and-liberal-democrats-warm-to-public-option-compromise.php" target="_blank">Talking Points Memo</a>]) will have scared the insurance companies and investors as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://barrdear.com/john/2009/10/13/just-a-smidgen-more-on-us-healthcare-reform/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

